Projecting 2025’s Biggest Bounce-Back Candidates

Dan enlists ZiPS to calculate the projected probability of 2024 underperformers getting their mojo back.

Projecting 2025’s Biggest Bounce-Back Candidates
Kim Klement Neitzel-USA TODAY Sports

The new year in baseball resets everyone back to zero, meaning that every team gets a chance to avenge their disappointments from 2024. Since this is a hopeful time, I asked the ZiPS projection system to crunch the numbers for the biggest bounce-back candidates for the 2025 season.

Determining what exactly constitutes a bounce-back season is a bit of a philosophical exercise, and since I can’t ask a complex bucket of algorithms to read the vibes, I narrowed down the list of candidates with a few qualifiers. I didn’t want any stone-cold sample size flukes, so I only looked at hitters who received at least 200 plate appearances in 2024, and limited the pitchers to those who threw at least 90 innings for those who started at least a third of their games, with a 30-inning threshold for relievers. I also only wanted to include players who were 2025-relevant, so I required the same minimums for projected playing time this year, based on our Depth Charts.

For hitters, I looked at those who underperformed their projected OPS+ by at least 20 points. I used OPS+ rather than wRC+ because I’m going for broad simplicity here. Starters and relievers have drastically different ranges of miss, so I just went with the top 15 starter and reliever misses by ERA+. I then ranked the hitters and pitchers by the amount of “missing” 2024 performance they’re projected to claw back in 2025. Let’s start with the hitters:

2024 ZiPS Hitter Misses, Sorted By Bounce Back %
Player Projected 2024 OPS+ Actual 2024 OPS+ Projected 2025 OPS+ Miss Bounce Bounce %
Jackson Holliday 103 66 107 37 41 111%
Miguel Vargas 102 46 103 56 57 102%
Kyle Stowers 102 65 100 37 35 96%
Javier Báez 83 46 80 37 34 92%
Austin Slater 98 73 96 25 23 92%
Chris Taylor 94 73 92 21 19 91%
Bo Naylor 103 73 100 30 27 89%
J.P. Crawford 108 86 106 22 20 89%
Hunter Goodman 99 70 96 29 26 89%
Christopher Morel 108 80 105 28 25 89%
Thairo Estrada 96 68 92 28 24 84%
Bo Bichette 122 71 112 51 41 81%
Edouard Julien 112 74 104 38 30 80%
DJ LeMahieu 97 51 88 46 37 80%
Ronald Acuña Jr. 164 101 151 63 50 79%
Taylor Walls 81 55 75 26 20 76%
Brandon Drury 98 35 83 63 48 75%
MJ Melendez 113 87 107 26 20 75%
Adolis García 114 94 108 20 14 73%
Nolan Jones 121 75 109 46 34 73%
Ke’Bryan Hayes 95 61 86 34 25 73%
Andrés Giménez 114 82 105 32 23 71%
Sean Murphy 121 76 108 45 32 71%
Nolan Gorman 116 85 106 31 21 70%
Chas McCormick 114 66 100 48 34 69%
Luis Campusano 102 78 94 24 16 68%
Gio Urshela 104 82 96 22 14 64%
Jonny DeLuca 104 75 92 29 17 58%
Adam Frazier 95 63 81 32 18 57%
Spencer Torkelson 122 89 108 33 19 57%
Paul Goldschmidt 124 98 113 26 15 57%
Jeimer Candelario 113 90 103 23 13 56%
Luis Robert Jr. 121 87 106 34 19 55%
Keibert Ruiz 108 74 92 34 18 53%
Wilmer Flores 115 72 94 43 22 52%
Jonah Heim 102 72 87 30 15 49%
Nick Fortes 89 56 72 33 16 49%
Danny Jansen 120 87 103 33 16 47%
Ty France 112 92 101 20 9 43%
Xander Bogaerts 117 92 103 25 11 43%
Logan O’Hoppe 124 100 110 24 10 43%
Max Kepler 112 91 99 21 8 39%
Mitch Garver 112 85 94 27 9 32%

Teams appear to be getting better and better at identifying the completely lost causes and not giving them plate appearances in the future. All of the hitters who underperformed their projections by at least 20 points of OPS+ and kept their jobs at least partially intact are forecast to take back some part of what they lost, even if it’s only a small percentage.

Jackson Holliday and Miguel Vargas are the most interesting hitters on this list, as despite their down seasons in the majors, ZiPS actually likes them slightly better in 2025 than it did entering 2024! In Holliday’s case, ZiPS was the most conservative of the projection systems entering 2024. It still missed quite high, of course, but not to quite the same degree as some of the other systems. Holliday was a mess in the majors, but a few factors cancel out some of this doom and gloom. He was very good in the minors, actually performing better in 2024 than in 2023, as his performance on the farm was all in Triple-A rather than mostly scattered across the lower levels. ZiPS also is less concerned about his struggles due to the fact that he was very young — he turned 21 just this winter — and because his experience in the majors came with very quick promotions. So while we shouldn’t be happy about Holliday’s anemic 2024, we shouldn’t panic either.

Vargas was terrible in Chicago, but he was terrible and unfortunate, a combination that was prevalent across the board for the Sox last year. Batters have a lot more control over their BABIP than pitchers do, but there are still limits, and Vargas’ .128 BABIP in Chicago is absolutely an unsustainable number. During the Divisional Era, there were 476 pitchers who accumulated 200 plate appearances over their careers. Only five (Brian Moehler, Don Carman, Mark Clark, Tommy Hanson, and Claudio Vargas) had a BABIP worse than .128. Wring just a bit of the horror out of Vargas’ 2024 big league campaign, and his excellent performance in the minors gives the White Sox at least some reason to be optimistic. Steamer’s projection for Vargas also ticked up slightly, so ZiPS isn’t on an island here.

Kyle Stowers bombed with the Marlins after the Trevor Rogers trade, but like the others, his minor league performance still leaves the hope that he should be at least an acceptable stopgap. Being an acceptable stopgap makes him one of Miami’s best offensive players!

Javier Báez’s bounce back is one of the more depressing ones, as he still projects to be one of the worst hitters of this group, it’s just that his abysmal 2024 performance probably overstates the case. That shouldn’t be a reason for the Tigers to give him playing time, or for you to draft him in your fantasy league, though.

ZiPS is generally not quite as excited about catchers bouncing back, in part because, well, catchers are weird. There’s a high washout rate for catchers who see their performance suddenly evaporate. The one big exception here is Bo Naylor, who ZiPS remains high on. Ronald Acuña Jr. gets a solid projection for 2025, but he is also coming off a projection that had him leading all position players in WAR by more than a win, so it’s hard for any projection system to assume that he’ll initially bounce back from his torn ACL that much. Now let’s look at the pitchers:

2024 ZiPS Pitcher Misses, Sorted By Bounce Back %
Player Projected 2024 ERA+ Actual 2024 ERA+ Projected 2025 ERA+ Miss Bounce Bounce %
Jhoan Duran 149 114 176 35 62 178%
Josh Hader 131 104 136 27 32 118%
Brandon Pfaadt 106 89 108 17 19 112%
Camilo Doval 112 79 114 33 35 107%
Kody Funderburk 100 64 101 36 37 102%
Logan Webb 123 111 122 12 11 97%
Caleb Thielbar 105 78 103 27 25 92%
George Kirby 119 104 117 15 13 88%
Brock Burke 119 72 112 47 40 85%
Justin Lawrence 104 71 95 33 24 73%
Tim Mayza 119 65 103 54 38 71%
David Bednar 134 73 116 61 43 71%
Justin Verlander 106 72 95 34 23 68%
Jordan Montgomery 124 67 105 57 38 68%
Erik Swanson 120 81 107 39 26 67%
Will Smith 103 65 90 38 25 65%
Dean Kremer 106 92 101 14 9 61%
Miles Mikolas 96 78 89 18 11 58%
Jordan Leasure 97 66 84 31 18 58%
Kevin Gausman 124 105 114 19 9 48%
Edwin Díaz 169 112 138 57 26 45%
Chris Bassitt 112 97 103 15 6 41%
Luis Castillo 126 101 111 25 10 41%
Kyle Hendricks 94 67 77 27 10 39%
Pete Fairbanks 140 112 121 28 9 32%
Shawn Armstrong 115 84 93 31 9 31%
Aaron Civale 106 94 97 12 3 23%
Jon Gray 103 88 91 15 3 22%
Griffin Canning 100 81 81 19 0 -1%
Zach Eflin 124 109 106 15 -3 -20%

ERA+ is a much weirder stat for pitchers than OBP/SLG measures are for hitters, so you have a handful of pitchers here with big improvements despite missing their projected ERA+ marks.

ZiPS basically looks at Jhoan Duran’s 2024 with the same disbelief I express when one of my cats insists they were never fed… about an hour after dinner. Duran’s FIP was better in 2024 than 2023, and ZiPS is a lot happier about the walk per nine he shed than the strikeout per nine he lost. ZiPS is the most optimistic of the projection systems on Duran, so I don’t think I can trick you into spreading the blame to Jared and Jordan if its forecast is off.

Since home runs allowed for a pitcher is a terrible statistic in terms of predicting the future, ZiPS isn’t worried about Josh Hader either. His 62% contact rate was his best since 2019 and a significant improvement over recent years, and he set a career-best for first-pitch strike percentage.

Brandon Pfaadt has arguably been the pitcher with the biggest gap between his traditional and sabermetric stats in recent years, with his xERA, the in-ZiPS equivalent, and FIP telling the story of a solid mid-rotation pitcher, while his actual career ERA is 5.06. He’s young enough and still near enough to being considered a prospect that I suspect he has a lot of rope, but I can’t imagine that it will last forever. If Jordan Montgomery had been better last season, Pfaadt might be in a precarious position, roster-wise.

ZiPS isn’t that concerned about Camilo Doval’s walk rate spike in 2024, given that first-pitch strike percentage is a leading indicator and he actually was better by that stat than in 2023 or 2022. It’s weird to think of Logan Webb as an underperformer, but he’s consistently been among the leaders in projected rest-of-career WAR among pitchers, and ZiPS hasn’t seen much of a reason to stop loving him.

On the negative side, while ZiPS still thinks Zach Eflin is a valuable no. 2 starter, a lot of his indicators went backwards in 2024, as he was simply a more hittable pitcher for the Rays and O’s. The dip in his strikeout rate has caused ZiPS to have some mild worry about Luis Castillo, and there’s little optimism that Kyle Hendricks will bounce back to a place where the Angels should be giving him playing time.

Who are your favorite bounce-back candidates in 2025? Let us know in the comments!

Source